Analysis of 3D Prints by X-ray Computed Microtomography and Terahertz Pulsed Imaging.Report as inadecuate


Analysis of 3D Prints by X-ray Computed Microtomography and Terahertz Pulsed Imaging.


Analysis of 3D Prints by X-ray Computed Microtomography and Terahertz Pulsed Imaging. - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

Publication Date: 2017-05

Journal Title: Pharmaceutical research

ISSN: 0724-8741

Publisher: Springer

Volume: 34

Issue: 5

Pages: 1037-1052

Language: English

Type: Article

This Version: VoR

Physical Medium: Print-Electronic

Metadata: Show full item record

Citation: Markl, D., Zeitler, J. A., Rasch, C., Michaelsen, M. H., Müllertz, A., Rantanen, J., Rades, T., & et al. (2017). Analysis of 3D Prints by X-ray Computed Microtomography and Terahertz Pulsed Imaging

Pharmaceutical research, 34 (5), 1037-1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-016-2083-1

Abstract: $\textbf{$Purpose:$}$ A 3D printer was used to realise compartmental dosage forms containing multiple active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) formulations. This work demonstrates the microstructural characterisation of 3D printed solid dosage forms using X-ray computed microtomography (XμCT) and terahertz pulsed imaging (TPI). $\textbf{$Methods:$}$ Printing was performed with either polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) or polylactic acid (PLA). The structures were examined by XμCT and TPI. Liquid self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system (SNEDDS) formulations containing saquinavir and halofantrine were incorporated into the 3D printed compartmentalised structures and $\textit{in vitro}$ drug release determined. $\textbf{$Results:$}$ A clear difference in terms of pore structure between PVA and PLA prints was observed by extracting the porosity (5.5% for PVA and 0.2% for PLA prints), pore length and pore volume from the XμCT data. The print resolution and accuracy was characterised by XμCT and TPI on the basis of the computer-aided design (CAD) models of the dosage form (compartmentalised PVA structures were 7.5 ± 0.75% larger than designed; $n$ = 3). $\textbf{$Conclusions:$}$ The 3D printer can reproduce specific structures very accurately, whereas the 3D prints can deviate from the designed model. The microstructural information extracted by XμCT and TPI will assist to gain a better understanding about the performance of 3D printed dosage forms.

Sponsorship: The Danish Council for Independent Research (DFF), Technology and Production Sciences (FTP), Project 12- 126515/0602-02670B (2013-2017), Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/L019922/1)

Embargo Lift Date: 2100-01-01

Identifiers:

External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-016-2083-1

This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/262909



Rights: Attribution 4.0 International

Licence URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/





Author: Markl, Daniel Zeitler, Jochen AxelRasch, CecilieMichaelsen, Maria HøtoftMüllertz, Anette Rantanen, Jukka Rades, ThomasBøtker,

Source: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/262909



DOWNLOAD PDF




Related documents