Analysing Multitarget Activity Landscapes using Protein-Ligand Interaction Fingerprints: Interaction cliffsReport as inadecuate


Analysing Multitarget Activity Landscapes using Protein-Ligand Interaction Fingerprints: Interaction cliffs


Analysing Multitarget Activity Landscapes using Protein-Ligand Interaction Fingerprints: Interaction cliffs - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

Publication Date: 2015-01-23

Journal Title: Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Publisher: American Chemical Society

Volume: 55

Issue: 2

Pages: 251-262

Language: English

Type: Article

Metadata: Show full item record

Citation: Méndez-Lucio, O., Kooistra, A. J., de Graaf, C., Bender, A., & Medina-Franco, J. L. (2015). Analysing Multitarget Activity Landscapes using Protein-Ligand Interaction Fingerprints: Interaction cliffs. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 55 (2), 251-262.

Description: This is the accepted manuscript. The final version is available from ACS at http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ci500721x.

Abstract: Activity landscape modelling is mostly a descriptive technique that allows rationalising continuous and discontinuous SARs. Nevertheless, the interpretation of some landscape features, especially of activity cliffs, is not straightforward. As the nature of activity cliffs depends on the ligand and the target, information regarding both should be included in the analysis. A specific way to include this information is using protein-ligand interaction fingerprints (IFPs). In this paper we report the activity landscape modelling of 507 ligand-kinase complexes (from KLIFS database) including IFP, which facilitates the analysis and interpretation of activity cliffs. Here we introduce the structure-activity-interaction similarity (SAIS) maps that incorporate information of ligand-target contact similarity. We also introduce the concept of interaction cliffs defined as ligand-target complexes with high structural and interaction similarity, but have a large potency difference of the ligands. Moreover, the information retrieved regarding the specific interaction allowed the identification of activity cliff hot spots, which help to rationalize activity cliffs from the target point of view. In general, the information provided by IFPs provide a structure-based understanding of some activity landscape features. This paper shows examples of analyses that can be carried out when IFPs are added to the activity landscape model.

Keywords: Activity landscape, Activity cliffs, Interaction cliffs, Protein-ligand interaction fingerprints, Kinase inhibitors, SAS maps

Sponsorship: M-L is very grateful to CONACyT (No. 217442/312933) and the Cambridge Overseas Trust for funding. AB thanks Unilever for funding and the European Research Council for a Starting Grant (ERC-2013- StG-336159 MIXTURE). J.L.M-F. is grateful to the School of Chemistry, Department of Pharmacy of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) for support. This work was supported by a scholarship from the Secretariat of Public Education and the Mexican government.

Identifiers:

This record's URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ci500721xhttp://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/247359





Author: Méndez-Lucio, OscarKooistra, Albert J.de Graaf, ChrisBender, AndreasMedina-Franco, José L.

Source: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/247359



DOWNLOAD PDF




Related documents