Clinical research data sharing: what an open science world means for researchers involved in evidence synthesisReport as inadecuate




Clinical research data sharing: what an open science world means for researchers involved in evidence synthesis - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

Systematic Reviews

, 5:159

First Online: 20 September 2016Received: 01 June 2016Accepted: 09 September 2016DOI: 10.1186-s13643-016-0334-1

Cite this article as: Ross, J.S. Syst Rev 2016 5: 159. doi:10.1186-s13643-016-0334-1

Abstract

The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors ICMJE recently announced a bold step forward to require data generated by interventional clinical trials that are published in its member journals to be responsibly shared with external investigators. The movement toward a clinical research culture that supports data sharing has important implications for the design, conduct, and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. While data sharing is likely to enhance the science of evidence synthesis, facilitating the identification and inclusion of all relevant research, it will also pose key challenges, such as requiring broader search strategies and more thorough scrutiny of identified research. Furthermore, the adoption of data sharing initiatives by the clinical research community should challenge the community of researchers involved in evidence synthesis to follow suit, including the widespread adoption of systematic review registration, results reporting, and data sharing, to promote transparency and enhance the integrity of the research process.

KeywordsData sharing Systematic reviews Clinical trials AbbreviationsICMJEInternational Committee of Medical Journal Editors

IOMInstitute of Medicine

IPDIndividual patient-level data

Download fulltext PDF



Author: Joseph S. Ross

Source: https://link.springer.com/



DOWNLOAD PDF




Related documents