A Note on Why Quarter of Birth is Not a Valid Instrument for Educational Attainment Report as inadecuate




A Note on Why Quarter of Birth is Not a Valid Instrument for Educational Attainment - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

Abstract

In their justification for using entrance cutoff dates and compulsory education laws as a natural experiment, the authors of Angrist and Krueger 1991 rightly give much attention to the effectiveness of compulsory attendance laws. However, the authors do not give proper attention to the decisions made by parents. If redshirting is commonplace and nonrandom, as it is in the ECLS-K data set, then the identifying assumption of monotonicity does not hold, and their identification scheme does not work. This problem is distinct from those discussed in Bound and Jaeger 2000.



Item Type: MPRA Paper -

Institution: University of Pennsylvania-

Original Title: A Note on Why Quarter of Birth is Not a Valid Instrument for Educational Attainment-

Language: English-

Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I20 - GeneralI - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education-





Author: Aliprantis, Dionissi

Source: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/5168/



DOWNLOAD PDF




Related documents