Complementary and Alternative Medicine on Wikipedia: Opportunities for ImprovementReport as inadecuate




Complementary and Alternative Medicine on Wikipedia: Opportunities for Improvement - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine - Volume 2014 2014, Article ID 105186, 4 pages -

Research Article

Department of Medical Research, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi 62247, Taiwan

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 3M7

Received 25 February 2014; Revised 31 March 2014; Accepted 3 April 2014; Published 17 April 2014

Academic Editor: Jenny M. Wilkinson

Copyright © 2014 Malcolm Koo. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Wikipedia, a free and collaborative Internet encyclopedia, has become one of the most popular sources of free information on the Internet. However, there have been concerns over the quality of online health information, particularly that on complementary and alternative medicine CAM. This exploratory study aimed to evaluate several page attributes of articles on CAM in the English Wikipedia. A total of 97 articles were analyzed and compared with eight articles of broad categories of therapies in conventional medicine using the Mann-Whitney U test. Based on the Wikipedia editorial assessment grading, 4% of the articles attained “good article” status, 34% required considerable editing, and 56% needed substantial improvements in their content. The median daily access of the articles over the previous 90 days was 372 range: 7–4,214. The median word count was 1840 with a readability of grade 12.7 range: 9.4–17.7. Medians of word count and citation density of the CAM articles were significantly lower than those in the articles of conventional medicine therapies. In conclusion, despite its limitations, the general public will continue to access health information on Wikipedia. There are opportunities for health professionals to contribute their knowledge and to improve the accuracy and completeness of the CAM articles on Wikipedia.





Author: Malcolm Koo

Source: https://www.hindawi.com/



DOWNLOAD PDF




Related documents