Fate of Articles That Warranted Retraction Due to Ethical Concerns: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional StudyReport as inadecuate




Fate of Articles That Warranted Retraction Due to Ethical Concerns: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

Objective

To study journals- responses to a request from the State Medical Association of Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany, to retract 88 articles due to ethical concerns, and to check whether the resulting retractions followed published guidelines.

Design

Descriptive cross-sectional study.

Population

88 articles 18 journals by the anaesthesiologist Dr. Boldt, that warranted retraction.

Method

According to the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics, we regarded a retraction as adequate when a retraction notice was published, linked to the retracted article, identified the title and authors of the retracted article in its heading, explained the reason and who took responsibility for the retraction, and when the retracted article was freely accessible and marked using a transparent watermark that preserved original content. Two authors extracted data independently January 2013 and contacted editors-in-chief and publishers for clarification in cases of inadequate retraction.

Results

Five articles 6% fulfilled all criteria for adequate retraction. Nine 10% were not retracted no retraction notice published, full text article not marked. 79 90% retraction notices were published, 76 86% were freely accessible, but only 15 17% were complete. 73 83% full text articles were marked as retracted, of which 14 16% had an opaque watermark hiding parts of the original content, and 11 13% had all original content deleted. 59 67% retracted articles were freely accessible. One editor-in-chief stated personal problems as a reason for incomplete retractions, eight blamed their publishers. Two publishers cited legal threats from Dr. Boldt-s co-authors which prevented them from retracting articles.

Conclusion

Guidelines for retracting articles are incompletely followed. The role of publishers in the retraction process needs to be clarified and standards are needed on marking retracted articles. It remains unclear who should check that retractions are done properly. Legal safeguards are required to allow retraction of articles against the wishes of authors.



Author: Nadia Elia , Elizabeth Wager, Martin R. Tramèr

Source: http://plos.srce.hr/



DOWNLOAD PDF




Related documents