Comparação entre formas de extração do tempo máximo fonatório em indivíduos sem queixas vocais Report as inadecuate




Comparação entre formas de extração do tempo máximo fonatório em indivíduos sem queixas vocais - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

Loriane Gratão Mesquita ; Renata Azevedo ;Revista CEFAC 2014, 16 5

Author: Marina Englert

Source: http://www.redalyc.org/


Teaser



Revista CEFAC ISSN: 1516-1846 revistacefac@cefac.br Instituto Cefac Brasil Englert, Marina; Gratão Mesquita, Loriane; Azevedo, Renata COMPARAÇÃO ENTRE FORMAS DE EXTRAÇÃO DO TEMPO MÁXIMO FONATÓRIO EM INDIVÍDUOS SEM QUEIXAS VOCAIS Revista CEFAC, vol.
16, núm.
5, septiembre-octubre, 2014, pp.
1615-1620 Instituto Cefac São Paulo, Brasil Available in: http:--www.redalyc.org-articulo.oa?id=169332702025 How to cite Complete issue More information about this article Journals homepage in redalyc.org Scientific Information System Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative 1615 COMPARAÇÃO ENTRE FORMAS DE EXTRAÇÃO DO TEMPO MÁXIMO FONATÓRIO EM INDIVÍDUOS SEM QUEIXAS VOCAIS Comparison of methods to extract the maximum phonation d uration in individuals without vocal complaints Marina Englert(1), LorianeGratão Mesquita (2), Renata Azevedo (3) ABSTRACT Purpose: to check the credibility between an acoustic program, an experienced evaluator and a nonexperienced evaluator measuring the Brazilian vowel -a- in subjects with no voice complaints and to verify if there is difference between the highest value of three emissions of MPD with the average of these values.
Methods: 56 adults recorded the vowel -a- in MPD.
One measurement was performed by an experienced speech pathologist and the other by a newly graduated speech pathologist, with a stop watch.
A third valuator measured the MPD in an acoustic program.
The difference between the average of the three emissions and the highest value of MPD obtained ​​by each evaluator was compared.
Results: there was no difference between the evaluators and an acoustic program the only difference found was among considering the average of the three emissions or the highest value of MPD.
Conclusions: the MPD has high reliability regardless the form of extraction and the clinical experience of the evaluator.
...





Related documents