Differential effects of focused and unfocused recasts on efl learners’ oral accuracy Report as inadecuate




Differential effects of focused and unfocused recasts on efl learners’ oral accuracy - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

Mohammad Hassan Chehrazad ;Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal 2015, 17 1

Author: Ali Akbar Ansarin

Source: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=305739087006


Teaser



Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal ISSN: 0123-4641 caljournal@yahoo.com Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas Colombia Akbar Ansarin, Ali; Hassan Chehrazad, Mohammad Differential effects of focused and unfocused recasts on EFL learners’ oral accuracy Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, vol.
17, núm.
1, enero-junio, 2015, pp.
86-97 Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas Bogotá, Colombia Available in: http:--www.redalyc.org-articulo.oa?id=305739087006 How to cite Complete issue More information about this article Journals homepage in redalyc.org Scientific Information System Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative RESEARCH ARTICLE Differential effects of focused and unfocused recasts on EFL learners’ oral accuracy Efectos diferenciados de reformulación enfocada y fuera de foco en la precisión oral de los aprendices del inglés como lengua extranjera Ali Akbar Ansarin1 Mohammad Hassan Chehrazad2 Citation - Para citar este artículo: Ansarin, A.
& Chehrazad, M.
(2015).
Differential effects of focused and unfocused recasts on the EFL learners’ oral accuracy.
Colomb.
Appl.
Linguist.
J., 17(1), pp.
86-97. Received: 11-Aug-2014 - Accepted: 11-Feb-2015 DOI: http:--dx.doi.org-10.14483-udistrital.jour.calj.2015.1.a06 Abstract One of the limitations of meaning-focused instruction in the EFL context is that a communicative approach is not sufficient enough to ensure higher levels of oral accuracy.
The purpose of the current study was to investigate the effects of two different focus-on-form techniques, unfocused and focused recasts, on EFL learners’ oral accuracy.
Three pre-intermediate intact classes were randomly selected as the focused recast, unfocused recast, and control groups. In the focused recast group, the focus of correction was on simple past tense errors.
In the unfocused recast group, the recast was prov...





Related documents