Estimating consensus and associated uncertainty between inherently different species distribution modelsReport as inadecuate

Estimating consensus and associated uncertainty between inherently different species distribution models - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

* Corresponding author 1 SYSTEM - Fonctionnement et conduite des systèmes de culture tropicaux et méditerranéens 2 CEFE - Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive 3 UR HYAX - Hydrobiologie 4 UE AGROCLIM - UE Agroclim

Abstract : 1. Forecasting shifts in biome and species distribution is crucially needed in the current context of global change. So far, most projections of vegetation distribution rely on correlative species distribution models SDMs. Yet, process-based or hybrid models based on explicit physiological description may be more robust to extrapolation under future climatic conditions. Differences between model projections may be wide, leading to scepticism among environmental stakeholders. 2. Here, we propose to combine outputs of several distributionmodels based on physiological responses, to produce both consensual maps of occurrences and maps of associated uncertainty. The consensus map relies on the conditional projections of each SDM. Because the models used are based on processes, their errors are likely to vary consistently with climate as some processes not implemented in a model might be important under a given set of climatic conditions. Uncertainty of the consensus model is thus assessed through multimodel regression of deviance maps with respect to current climatic conditions, and can be extrapolated to forecast climates. 3. We illustrate this approach using three SDMs, on three widely distributed European trees Fagus sylvatica L., Quercus robur L. and Pinus sylvestris L., and project their distributions under two scenarios. The conditional consensus outperforms classical methods of model consensus i.e. to use the mean, the median or a weighted average of individualSDMoutputs in projecting current occurrences. 4. Consistently, with the results of individual SDMs, the conditional consensus projects that the suitable areas for F. sylvatica and Q. robur will expand towards north-eastern Europe, while that of P. sylvestris will contract. Projections of future occurrence are most uncertain towards themargins of the distribution particularly the trailing edge. 5. Our approach can help modellers identify the limitations of each SDMand stakeholders pinpoint the regions of models agreement and highest certainty.

Keywords : model assessment Quercus robur likelihood correlative distribution models environmental clustering of model errors Fagus sylvatica Pinus sylvestris process-based distribution models climate change

Author: Emmanuel Gritti - Anne Duputié - François Massol - Isabelle Chuine -



Related documents