Identifying differential miR and gene consensus patterns in peripheral blood of patients with cardiovascular diseases from literature dataReport as inadecuate




Identifying differential miR and gene consensus patterns in peripheral blood of patients with cardiovascular diseases from literature data - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

, 17:173

Coronary artery disease

Abstract

BackgroundNumerous recent studies suggest the potential of circulating MicroRNAs miRs in peripheral blood samples as diagnostic or prognostic markers for coronary artery disease CAD, acute coronary syndrome ACS and heart failure HF. However, literature often remains inconclusive regarding as to which markers are most indicative for which of the above diseases. This shortcoming is mainly due to the lack of a systematic analyses and absence of information on the functional pathophysiological role of these miRs and their target genes.

MethodsWe here provide an-easy-to-use scoring approach to investigate the likelihood of regulation of several miRs and their target genes from literature by identifying consensus patterns of regulation. We therefore have screened over 1000 articles that study mRNA markers in cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, and devised a scoring algorithm to identify consensus means for miRs and genes regulation across several studies. We then aimed to identify differential markers between CAD, ACS and HF.

ResultsWe first identified miRs miR-122, −126, −223, −138 and −370 as commonly regulated within a group of metabolic disease, while investigating cardiac-related pathologies CAD, ACS, HF revealed a decisive role of miR-1, −499, −208b, and -133a. Looking at differential markers between cardiovascular disease revealed miR-1, miR-208a and miR-133a to distinguish ACS and CAD to HF. Relating differentially expressed miRs to their putative gene targets using MirTarBase, we further identified HCN2-4 and LASP1 as potential markers of CAD and ACS, but not in HF. Likewise, BLC-2 was found oppositely regulated between CAD and HF. Interestingly, while studying overlap in target genes between CAD, ACS and HF only revealed little similarities, mapping these genes to gene ontology terms revealed a surprising similarity between CAD and ACS compared to HF.

ConclusionWe conclude that our analysis using gene and miR scores allows the extraction of meaningful markers and the elucidation of differential pathological functions between cardiac diseases and provides a novel approach for literature screening for miR and gene consensus patterns. The analysis is easy to use and extendable upon further emergent literature as we provide an Excel sheet for this analysis to the community.

Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article doi:10.1186-s12872-017-0609-z contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Download fulltext PDF



Author: Agnė Šatrauskienė - Rokas Navickas - Aleksandras Laucevičius - Heinrich J. Huber

Source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12872-017-0609-z







Related documents