Tumor phenotype and breast density in distinct categories of interval cancer: results of population-based mammography screening in SpainReport as inadecuate




Tumor phenotype and breast density in distinct categories of interval cancer: results of population-based mammography screening in Spain - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

Breast Cancer Research

, 16:R3

First Online: 10 January 2014Received: 23 May 2013Accepted: 06 January 2014DOI: 10.1186-bcr3595

Cite this article as: Domingo, L., Salas, D., Zubizarreta, R. et al. Breast Cancer Res 2014 16: R3. doi:10.1186-bcr3595

Abstract

IntroductionInterval cancers are tumors arising after a negative screening episode and before the next screening invitation. They can be classified into true interval cancers, false-negatives, minimal-sign cancers, and occult tumors based on mammographic findings in screening and diagnostic mammograms. This study aimed to describe tumor-related characteristics and the association of breast density and tumor phenotype within four interval cancer categories.

MethodsWe included 2,245 invasive tumors 1,297 screening-detected and 948 interval cancers diagnosed from 2000 to 2009 among 645,764 women aged 45 to 69 who underwent biennial screening in Spain. Interval cancers were classified by a semi-informed retrospective review into true interval cancers n = 455, false-negatives n = 224, minimal-sign n = 166, and occult tumors n = 103. Breast density was evaluated using Boyd’s scale and was conflated into: <25%; 25 to 50%; 50 to 75%; >75%. Tumor-related information was obtained from cancer registries and clinical records. Tumor phenotype was defined as follows: luminal A: ER+-HER2- or PR+-HER2-; luminal B: ER+-HER2+ or PR+-HER2+; HER2: ER-PR-HER2+; triple-negative: ER-PR-HER2-. The association of tumor phenotype and breast density was assessed using a multinomial logistic regression model. Adjusted odds ratios OR and 95% confidence intervals 95% CI were calculated. All statistical tests were two-sided.

ResultsForty-eight percent of interval cancers were true interval cancers and 23.6% false-negatives. True interval cancers were associated with HER2 and triple-negative phenotypes OR = 1.91 95% CI:1.22-2.96, OR = 2.07 95% CI:1.42-3.01, respectively and extremely dense breasts >75% OR = 1.67 95% CI:1.08-2.56. However, among true interval cancers a higher proportion of triple-negative tumors was observed in predominantly fatty breasts <25% than in denser breasts 28.7%, 21.4%, 11.3% and 14.3%, respectively; <0.001. False-negatives and occult tumors had similar phenotypic characteristics to screening-detected cancers, extreme breast density being strongly associated with occult tumors OR = 6.23 95% CI:2.65-14.66. Minimal-sign cancers were biologically close to true interval cancers but showed no association with breast density.

ConclusionsOur findings revealed that both the distribution of tumor phenotype and breast density play specific and independent roles in each category of interval cancer. Further research is needed to understand the biological basis of the overrepresentation of triple-negative phenotype among predominantly fatty breasts in true interval cancers.

AbbreviationsANOVAanalysis of variance

CIconfidence intervals

ERestrogen receptor

HER2human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

MBDSMinimum Basic Data Set OR: odds ratio

PRprogesterone receptor.

Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article doi:10.1186-bcr3595 contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Download fulltext PDF



Author: Laia Domingo - Dolores Salas - Raquel Zubizarreta - Marisa Baré - Garbiñe Sarriugarte - Teresa Barata - Josefa Ibáñez -

Source: https://link.springer.com/







Related documents