Public health program capacity for sustainability: a new frameworkReport as inadecuate




Public health program capacity for sustainability: a new framework - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

Implementation Science

, 8:15

First Online: 01 February 2013Received: 19 April 2012Accepted: 22 January 2013DOI: 10.1186-1748-5908-8-15

Cite this article as: Schell, S.F., Luke, D.A., Schooley, M.W. et al. Implementation Sci 2013 8: 15. doi:10.1186-1748-5908-8-15

Abstract

BackgroundPublic health programs can only deliver benefits if they are able to sustain activities over time. There is a broad literature on program sustainability in public health, but it is fragmented and there is a lack of consensus on core constructs. The purpose of this paper is to present a new conceptual framework for program sustainability in public health.

MethodsThis developmental study uses a comprehensive literature review, input from an expert panel, and the results of concept-mapping to identify the core domains of a conceptual framework for public health program capacity for sustainability. The concept-mapping process included three types of participants scientists, funders, and practitioners from several public health areas e.g., tobacco control, heart disease and stroke, physical activity and nutrition, and injury prevention.

ResultsThe literature review identified 85 relevant studies focusing on program sustainability in public health. Most of the papers described empirical studies of prevention-oriented programs aimed at the community level. The concept-mapping process identified nine core domains that affect a program’s capacity for sustainability: Political Support, Funding Stability, Partnerships, Organizational Capacity, Program Evaluation, Program Adaptation, Communications, Public Health Impacts, and Strategic Planning. Concept-mapping participants further identified 93 items across these domains that have strong face validity—89% of the individual items composing the framework had specific support in the sustainability literature.

ConclusionsThe sustainability framework presented here suggests that a number of selected factors may be related to a program’s ability to sustain its activities and benefits over time. These factors have been discussed in the literature, but this framework synthesizes and combines the factors and suggests how they may be interrelated with one another. The framework presents domains for public health decision makers to consider when developing and implementing prevention and intervention programs. The sustainability framework will be useful for public health decision makers, program managers, program evaluators, and dissemination and implementation researchers.

KeywordsProgram sustainability Concept mapping Chronic disease programs Evaluation Dissemination and implementation Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article doi:10.1186-1748-5908-8-15 contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Download fulltext PDF



Author: Sarah F Schell - Douglas A Luke - Michael W Schooley - Michael B Elliott - Stephanie H Herbers - Nancy B Mueller - Ali

Source: https://link.springer.com/







Related documents