Measuring food security: Definitional sensitivity and implications Report as inadecuate

Measuring food security: Definitional sensitivity and implications - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

Six methods for measuring food security are identified from the literature. The dietary intake method (DIM) and the food insecurity experienced-based measurement scales (FIEMS), the two most commonly used, were empirically tested using 1152 rural households in the Punjab province of Pakistan. Results show significant differences in the measurement of food insecure households: 22.9% with DIM vs. 4.7% with FIEMS. A slight change in the food security definition resulted in significant differences. With slight definitional changes, 6.5% of the sample households appeared food insecure using DIM and only 1.1% using FIEMS. Given its high definitional sensitivity, food security must be carefully defined according to country specific conditions and should reflect local diversity.

Keywords: Food security ; hunger ; measurement ; vulnerability analysis ; value at risk ; conditional value at risk

Subject(s): Food Security and Poverty

Issue Date: 2012-02

Publication Type: Conference Paper/ Presentation

PURL Identifier:

Total Pages: 17

Record appears in: Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society (AARES) > 2012 Conference (56th), February 7-10, 2012, Fremantle, Australia

Author: Bashir, Muhammad Khalid ; Schilizzi, Steven


Related documents