Results of open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair according to the e-pass score Report as inadecuate




Results of open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair according to the e-pass score - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

Bárbara Ferrarezi ; Moisés Amâncio de Souza ; Susyanne Lavor Cosme ; Giovani José Dal Poggetto Molinari ;Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular-Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2016, 31 1

Author: Fábio Hüsemann Menezes

Source: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=398945315006


Teaser



Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular-Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery ISSN: 0102-7638 revista@sbccv.org.br Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular Brasil Hüsemann Menezes, Fábio; Ferrarezi, Bárbara; Amâncio de Souza, Moisés; Lavor Cosme, Susyanne; Dal Poggetto Molinari, Giovani José Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E -PASS Score Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular-Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, vol.
31, núm.
1, enero-febrero, 2016, pp.
22-30 Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular São José do Rio Preto, Brasil Available in: http:--www.redalyc.org-articulo.oa?id=398945315006 How to cite Complete issue More information about this article Journals homepage in redalyc.org Scientific Information System Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2016;31(1):22-30 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Results of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair According to the E-PASS Score Fábio Hüsemann Menezes1, MD, MSc, PhD; Bárbara Ferrarezi1; Moisés Amâncio de Souza1, MD; Susyanne Lavor Cosme1, MD; Giovani José Dal Poggetto Molinari2, MD DOI: 10.5935-1678-9741.20160006 Abstract 7.69% for EVAR (P=0.263), EVAR presented a death relative risk of 0.647.
It was also found a lower intraoperative bleeding for EVAR (OR=1417.48±1180.42 mL versus EVAR=597.80±488.81 mL, P 0.0002) and a shorter operative time for endovascular repair (OR=4.40±1.08 hours versus EVAR=3.58±1.26 hours, P 0.003).
The postoperative complications presented no statistical difference between groups (OR=29.03% versus EVAR=25.27%, P=0.35). Conclusion: EVAR presents a better short term outcome than OR in all classes of physiologic risk.
In order to train future vascular surgeons on OR, only young and healthy patients, who carry a very low risk of adverse...





Related documents