Comparison: real and simulated ear insertion gain Report as inadecuate




Comparison: real and simulated ear insertion gain - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

Maria Fernanda Capoani Garcia Mondelli ; Debora Viviane Ferrari ;Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 2011, 77 5

Author: Patrícia Danieli Campos

Source: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=392437918003


Teaser



Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology ISSN: 1808-8694 revista@aborlccf.org.br Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia CérvicoFacial Brasil Danieli Campos, Patrícia; Capoani Garcia Mondelli, Maria Fernanda; Viviane Ferrari, Debora Comparison: real and simulated ear insertion gain Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, vol.
77, núm.
5, septiembre-octubre, 2011, pp.
555-558 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial São Paulo, Brasil Available in: http:--www.redalyc.org-articulo.oa?id=392437918003 How to cite Complete issue More information about this article Journals homepage in redalyc.org Scientific Information System Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;77(5):555-8. Para citar este artigo, use o título em inglês ORIGINAL ARTICLE BJORL .org Comparison: real and simulated ear insertion gain Comparação: ganho de inserção obtido em orelha real e simulado Patrícia Danieli Campos1, Maria Fernanda Capoani Garcia Mondelli2, Debora Viviane Ferrari3 Keywords: hearing aids, hearing loss, simulation. Abstract Palavras-chave: auxiliares de audição, perda auditiva, simulação. Resumo T he development of hearing aid (HA) software programming does not replace the analysis of real ears with probe microphones.
Aim: To compare simulated insertion gain in HA software programming and real ear insertion gain.
Method: A prospective study of 62 patients (aged from 29 to 93 years; 30 male and 32 female).
All patients presented unilateral (n=14) or bilateral (n=48) and mild to profound sensorineural hearing impairment.
110 ears assessed.
Data was gathered from medical records and the insertion gain was obtained in real ears for comparison with the simulated insertion gain in HA software programming.
Statistical tests were applied to analyze the correlation ...





Related documents