Laboratory demonstration of a prozone-like effect in HRP2-detecting malaria rapid diagnostic tests: implications for clinical managementReport as inadecuate




Laboratory demonstration of a prozone-like effect in HRP2-detecting malaria rapid diagnostic tests: implications for clinical management - Download this document for free, or read online. Document in PDF available to download.

Malaria Journal

, 10:286

First Online: 29 September 2011Received: 21 May 2011Accepted: 29 September 2011

Abstract

BackgroundMalaria rapid diagnostic tests RDTs are now widely used for prompt on-site diagnosis in remote endemic areas where reliable microscopy is absent. Aberrant results, whereby negative test results occur at high parasite densities, have been variously reported for over a decade and have led to questions regarding the reliability of the tests in clinical use.

MethodsIn the first trial, serial dilutions of recombinant HRP2 antigen were tested on an HRP2-detectiing RDT. In a second trial, serial dilutions of culture-derived Plasmodium falciparum parasites were tested against three HRP2-detecting RDTs.

ResultsA prozone-like effect occurred in RDTs at a high concentration of the target antigen, histidine-rich protein-2 above 15,000 ng-ml, a level that corresponds to more than 312000 parasites per μL. Similar results were noted on three RDT products using dilutions of cultured parasites up to a parasite density of 25%. While reduced line intensity was observed, no false negative results occurred.

ConclusionsThese results suggest that false-negative malaria RDT results will rarely occur due to a prozone-like effect in high-density infections, and other causes are more likely. However, RDT line intensity is poorly indicative of parasite density in high-density infections and RDTs should, therefore, not be considered quantitative. Immediate management of suspected severe malaria should rely on clinical assessment or microscopy. Evaluation against high concentrations of antigen should be considered in malaria RDT product development and lot-release testing, to ensure that very weak or false negative results will not occur at antigen concentrations that might be seen clinically.

Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article doi:10.1186-1475-2875-10-286 contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Download fulltext PDF



Author: Jennifer Luchavez - Joanne Baker - Sheila Alcantara - Vicente BelizarioJr - Qin Cheng - James S McCarthy - David Bell

Source: https://link.springer.com/







Related documents